- Due Sep 29 by 11:59pm
- Points 100
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Photograph of newspaper journalists at work. Chris McGrath. (n.d.). Getty Images [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.gettyimages.com/license/844218776
This activity addresses module outcome 3. Upon completion of this activity, you will be able to:
- MO3: Explore the use of facilitation as a process to engage competing points of view. (CO1, 5)
In the process of mediation, the disagreement that brought the parties in may have an underlying issue that needs to be resolved before addressing the surface issue. It is after the intake, opening statement, and through facilitation where the underlying issue may be unveiled. It is important to be able to separate facts and opinion during this process.
In the articles below, both pieces have political undertones and both discuss certain operative facts that surround the story. Neither author asks to mediate their difference of opinions. However, some type of facilitation, between writers or even the editorial boards of each newspaper, might alter the outcome where the group agrees to a common set of facts.
For this assignment, please read the following two articles and then respond to the prompts in 1-2 paragraphs:
- Phillips, A. (2017). The story of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and an indicted IT staffer that’s lighting up the right, explained (Links to an external site.). Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/08/08/the-story-of-debbie-wasserman-schultz-and-an-it-staffer-thats-lighting-up-the-right/?utm_term=.ec8e1fa09b56
- Strassel, K.A. (2017, August 3). The scandal that matters (Links to an external site.). Retrieved from https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2017/08/04/democratic_it_mess_is_a_scandal_that_matters_417390.html
If you were asked to facilitate such a matter, what type of opening statement would you make? Keep in mind that this could possibly look like some type of debate or town hall meeting.
Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc.) and save it frequently to your computer. For those assignments that are not written essays and require uploading images or PowerPoint slides, please follow uploading guidelines provided by your instructor.
Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Submit Assignment” in the upper right corner. Click on “Browse,” browse your computer, and select your file. Click “Open” and verify the correct file name has appeared next to the Browse button. Enter your comments, if any, in the Comments area. Click on “Submit Assignment.”
Evaluation
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also access the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. All mediation documents combined are worth 15% of your final course grade.
Rubric
SPS_Default_Graduate_Writing_Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction/ Articulation of the topic | 15.0 pts(A) The topic/purpose of assignment is succinct and clearly defined.13.0 pts(B) The topic/purpose of assignment is defined. Minor points need further development.11.0 pts(C) The topic/purpose of assignment is missing information or has too many components.9.0 pts(D) The topic/purpose of assignment is not clear to the reader.7.0 pts(F) The topic/purpose of assignment cannot be determined from the information provided or is inaccurate.0.0 ptsCriterion not addressed/ Did not submit assignment | 15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis | 30.0 pts(A) The topic and all required components of the assignment are comprehensively and insightfully analyzed using evidence from sources and the student’s own perspective.26.0 pts(B) The topic and required components of the assignment are analyzed using evidence from sources and the student’s own perspective. Minor points require further development.23.0 pts(C) The topic and required components of the assignment are discussed using evidence from sources and the student’s own perspective. Information provided is primarily a restatement of facts. The connection between student’s perspective and source information can be difficult for the reader to see. Key details or discussion of a few components of the selected question are missing.20.0 pts(D) The topic and required components of the assignment are briefly discussed. Information provided is primarily from the student’s perspective. Major details/many components are missing or information demonstrates misconception of the content.16.0 pts(F) The topic and components of the assignment are briefly discussed. Sources are not used in the discussion. Information provided demonstrates major misconceptions with the content or any supporting are not present. Reader cannot ascertain the points the student is making.0.0 ptsCriterion not addressed/ Did not submit assignment | 30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion | 20.0 pts(A) Conclusion is logical and implications reflect student’s critical and informed evaluation of the evidence and content.17.0 pts(B) Conclusion is logical and implications reflect the student’s analysis. Minor points need further development.15.0 pts(C) Conclusion is logical and implications are identified. Details are missing that would clarify the connection between the body of the paper and the conclusion.13.0 pts(D) Conclusion needs additional clarification to demonstrate understanding of the topic. Implications are oversimplified.10.0 pts(F) Conclusion is incomplete and vague. Implications are missing.0.0 ptsCriterion not addressed/ Did not submit assignment | 20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources & Evidence & APA Formatting* *Requirements are assignment specific. Check assignment directions. | 15.0 pts(A) Clearly identifies scholarly, credible, and relevant sources of evidence (per assignment directions) to develop ideas related to topic. Student clearly and consistently differentiates own thoughts from those of others at all times. Correct APA formatting, per assignment directions, is used in all aspects of the paper.13.0 pts(B) Identifies scholarly, credible, and relevant sources of evidence (per assignment directions) to develop ideas related to the topic. In general, student differentiates own thoughts from those of others. APA formatting, per assignment directions, is used, there may be a few minor formatting errors (e.g., minor errors in reference page, cover page title or paper number missing, etc.).11.0 pts(C) In general, identifies credible and relevant sources of evidence (per assignment directions). Student does not clearly differentiate own thoughts from those of others in several places. APA formatting, per assignment directions, is used; however, there are minor formatting errors (e.g., minor errors in reference page, no cover page, etc.).9.0 pts(D) Sources identified are relevant, but at least some are not credible (per assignment directions). Student does not clearly differentiate own thoughts from those of others in several places. APA formatting, per assignment directions, is used; there are major formatting errors (e.g., not linking in-text citations with reference page, not citing sources, etc.).7.0 pts(F) If sources of evidence are identified (per assignment directions), student does not differentiate own thoughts from those of others OR does not identify sources.0.0 ptsNo submission | 15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization | 10.0 pts(A) Written work progresses logically and ideas are well-developed and cohesive. There is a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs are well-developed; transitions are seamless.8.0 pts(B) Written work progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are generally smooth. Paragraphs are developed, but lack cohesion in several areas. However, reader can follow the paper’s flow.7.0 pts(C) Written work usually progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are occasionally missing or incomplete. Paragraphs are not consistently cohesive; however, reader can follow the paper’s flow.6.0 pts(D) Written work often does not progress logically and ideas are often not fully formed. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are often missing or incomplete. Lack of cohesion within paragraphs makes it difficult to follow the paper’s flow.5.0 pts(F) Written work lacks logical flow and ideas are not fully formed. Transitions are not visible. Paragraphs are not cohesive and the reader cannot follow the flow of the paper.0.0 ptsDid not submit assignment | 10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSyntax & Mechanics | 10.0 pts(A) Clearly and consistently uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.8.0 pts(B) Uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few minor errors, which do not interfere with meaning.7.0 pts(C) Generally, uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few errors that interfere with meaning.6.0 pts(D) There are many grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with meaning.5.0 pts(F) There are major grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that make it extremely difficult to read and understand.0.0 ptsDid not submit assignment | 10.0 pts |
| Total Points: 100.0 |